Irony can be hard to communicate in text. Sorry for causing a misunderstanding. My point was that I fully support that nuclear is not only safe, but a technolo

Irony can be hard to communicate in text. Sorry for causing a misunderstanding. My point was that I fully support that nuclear is not only safe, but a technology that saves millions of lives every year, since without it, the world would use coal instead. Furthermore, if more coal could be replaced by nuclear, it would not only delay global warming, but also potentially save tens of millions of lives. The extra cost per GWh is more than made up for in health benefits. But if the costs are seen as too high for current powerplant models, it should be possible to bring the costs down a lot if they are mass-produced and some more to gain from slighly relaxing regulations where the price/benefit of regulations is unreasonable.