3 ms·
Hey guys, there's no scientific definition for a fish either. Evolutionarily speaking, from the perspective of monophyletic taxonomy, if fish were a thing, we'd
by stillbourne 4y ago
Hey guys, there's no scientific definition for a fish either. Evolutionarily speaking, from the perspective of monophyletic taxonomy, if fish were a thing, we'd also be classified as fish. We're not though we're vertebrates. Bees are pancrustacean hexapod invertebrates, as are all insects generally, as adults adapted to land rather than being amphibious, even if they have an amphibious larval stage, which bees don't. There is a tendency to consider anything less evolved than an amniote as a fish in general practice. That would include insects.