4 ms·
I think your mistake here is to look at dealers simply as sales outlets. Dealers would deny that. You sell a car once, but you work on it multiple times throu
by rootusrootus 4y ago
I think your mistake here is to look at dealers simply as sales outlets. Dealers would deny that. You sell a car once, but you work on it multiple times throughout its life. IMO the problem with comparing to other retail channels is that most things we buy aren't expensive enough to warrant the same level of upkeep as a $30,000 car.
Tesla has made fixed-price online sales work so far, but notice that they're scrambling to build the support network. They're re-creating most of the dealership model but bringing the ownership in-house. That's only good if their customer service is good, because now you don't really have any good alternatives.
> why has this obvious disruption never come up in the last ~100+ years of car sales in this country and all over the world?
This is important. We can try to point to laws, but the more likely answer is that the current model is the best we've invented yet. There have been attempts to change, and more often than not it's the consumers that reject it, not lawmakers.
- jethro_tell 4y agoBefore recent markups because of parts shortages, dealers mostly made almost nothing on new cars. Even now I'd assume most of their money comes from service and used car sales.
- jasomill 4y agoMostly true in terms of margins, at least if you consider finance and insurance separately from vehicle sales (as all dealerships do). Nevertheless, new vehicle sales including F&I is a non-negligible factor in most dealerships' bottom line, and new vehicle sales can also be a significant driver of service volume (both organically and as a result of loyalty incentives). You're also correct in assuming COVID has been good for new vehicle sales profitability. Here are the per-segment breakdowns reported by the three largest dealership groups in the US, before and after COVID: 1. AutoNation (AN) 2019 Rv: 52.3% New, 25.6% Used, 16.7% S&P, 4.8% F&I, 0.6% Other 2019 GP: 14.3% New, 10.4% Used, 46.1% S&P, 29.0% F&I 2021 Rv: 46.7% New, 33.4% Used, 14.3% S&P, 5.4% F&I, 0.2% Other 2021 GP: 24.3% New, 13.9% Used, 33.8% S&P, 28.0% F&I 2. Penske Automotive (PAG) (excluding non-retail auto dealership businesses) 2019 Rv: 45% New, 35% Used, 6% Fleet, 11% S&P, 3% F&I 2019 GP: 23% New, 12% Used, 1% Fleet, 43% S&P, 21% F&I 2021 Rv: 44% New, 38% Used, 5% Fleet, 10% S&P, 3% F&I 2021 GP: 27% New, 17% Used, 2% Fleet, 34% S&P, 20% F&I 3. Sonic Automotive (SAH) 2019 Rv: 47.0% New, 35.0% Used, 13.0% S&P, 5.0% F&I and Other 2019 GP: 15.0% New, 10.0% Used, 44.0% S&P, 31.0% F&I and Other 2021 Rv: 41.3% New, 39.3% Used, 11.3% S&P, 8.1% F&I and Other 2021 GP: 24.1% New, 6.9% Used, 35.2% S&P, 33.8% F&I and Other (Rv = revenue as percentage of total, GP = gross profit as percentage of total, New, Used, Fleet = vehicle sales, S&P = Service and Parts, F&I = Finance and Insurance) (source: SEC filings) N.B.: Gross profit may be a misleading figure in this comparison, as it excludes major expenses (notably, salaries and commissions for non-administrative staff) directly attributable to particular business segments. Alas, I'm lazy, and these are the only per-segment percentages immediately available in all dealership 10-Ks. With all that said, I imagine many, possibly most, dealerships would remain comfortably profitable even if net (non-F&I!) profit on new vehicle sales were zero. Finally, note that fixed vehicle pricing is not exactly a new idea: GM famously introduced the Saturn marque with a similar tactic. And as with this older example, I assume Ford isn't planning to mandate fixed pricing on financing, insurance, trade-in allowances, third-party extended warranties, dealership-installed options, or anything else beyond the selling price of the vehicle itself and possibly certain minor fees related to the sale.