> It's extremely troubling that given all this corporate authoritarian AI tech they built that Microsoft is still trying to be the voice of reason about the dan

> It's extremely troubling that given all this corporate authoritarian AI tech they built that Microsoft is still trying to be the voice of reason about the dangers of AI. Just speculating, but this phenomenon could either be explained by 1.) diverse internal opinion; the parts of Microsoft responsible for warning against AI are not the same parts pushing authorarian AI software, or 2.) Moat-building/ladder-pulling; Microsoft is warning people of the danger of _other people's_ AI, but of course you can trust _their_ AI, because they're the ones warning you after all!