4 ms·
> The taxation of assets (beyond a certain point so that people don't need to sell their home) and not just income. That’s a great way to discourage investment
by barry-cotter 4y ago
> The taxation of assets (beyond a certain point so that people don't need to sell their home) and not just income.
That’s a great way to discourage investment and capital formation and encourage emigration. There’s a reason wealth taxes are not popular in OECD countries.
https://taxfoundation.org/wealth-taxes-in-the-oecd/ https://taxfoundation.org/wealth-taxes-in-the-oecd/
- kcartlidge 4y agoThat rather assumes that untaxed wealth (as opposed to income) is productive wealth, which is not necessarily the case. And that even if it were, there's an assumption that the (perhaps valid) concerns are the priority and not the introduction of a fairer system.
- dane-pgp 4y ago> There’s a reason wealth taxes are not popular in OECD countries. Well, there are two reasons: the Prisoner's Dilemma, and good old fashioned bribery (or "campaign financing" as we euphemistically call it). Fortunately, however, the recent agreement for a global minimum corporation tax rate[0] shows that major economies can sometimes solve the coordination problem needed to avoid the "race to the bottom" that capitalists try to impose on nation states. A modest proposal would be that the top 1% of wealth holders in the world would have to pay a 1% annual tax to their country of residence. The WTO could be tasked with determining the true wealth of any multi-millionaires who bribe national officials into under-reporting their holdings. Any country that defects from this agreement, and any multi-millionaire who hides in one of those countries, would be met with sanctions and treated like the corrupt oligarch that they are. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_minimum_corporate_tax_rate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_minimum_corporate_tax_r...