> Ah, it sounds like you may need to study a little history if you’re curious about these terms. I am a mind in thrall to delusion. > Sex bias means a cultura

> Ah, it sounds like you may need to study a little history if you’re curious about these terms. I am a mind in thrall to delusion. > Sex bias means a cultural bias or prejudice based on someone’s sex. Using the word “prejudice” to define “bias” doesn’t help me to understand the term. > Cultural bias is about having ingrained prejudices in large social groups. Okay, so different people having different assumptions which they use to judge phenomena. > The goal is to remove bias and prejudice that is hurting certain categories of people, preventing them from having equal access to opportunity to improve their lives, and to make decisions about people based on their interests and abilities, and to establish and respect some basic human rights across the board. There are lots of things that lots of people will tell me are hurting them. Personally, I don’t care about any of them. But how do you prioritize one claimed hurt over another? > but this sounds like a straw man and that you’re skeptical Probably, I was just guessing. > I will turn your question back on you: what is the alternative you’re suggesting, do you support having different standards for men and women in QA? I don’t really care. The hiring/promoting practices of 2022 American QA departments doesn’t interest me. Let the Harvest Gods have their day. > Do you support the idea that a woman developer who writes the same quality of code and works as hard and has the same level of experience as her male coworker should be paid the same amount? Depends on the context. Does disqualifying the woman help me to get what I want, then I’m all for it. Otherwise, I don’t care.