3 ms·
N=3 is an absurd sample size to base hiring or investment decisions on, especially considering that each halving will have a smaller effect than the previous.
by andy81 4y ago
N=3 is an absurd sample size to base hiring or investment decisions on, especially considering that each halving will have a smaller effect than the previous.
- wbsss4412 4y agoIt’s better than making an assumption that runs completely contrary to the he limited actual data that you do have.
- JohnJamesRambo 4y agoAnd yet here we are, in another bear year right on schedule... https://www.lookintobitcoin.com/charts/bitcoin-investor-tool/ https://www.lookintobitcoin.com/charts/bitcoin-investor-tool...
- mentalpiracy 4y agoN=3 is an absurd sample size when you are sampling from an otherwise large pool. When N=3 because that's the entire size of the sampling pool, failing to take heed of those patterns is an unforced error.