3 ms·
There is an interesting dichotomy. On one hand, you simply cannot build advanced semiconductors without thousands of people in scale. We wouldn't have cheap sem
by systemvoltage 4y ago
There is an interesting dichotomy. On one hand, you simply cannot build advanced semiconductors without thousands of people in scale. We wouldn't have cheap semiconductors if it wasn't for big corporations. On the other hand, the moat that they build in the process through various ways (market capture, lock-ins, IP threats, etc) are real obstacles for startups. Startups are the seeds that clear out old forests and rejuvinate the land. They're necessary but so are the forces that are their obstacles. Conversation here is generally sawtoothing between these two opposing forces but may be there is a role here for some minor form of regulation. A type of an economic free zone for startups where they're immune from large corporate pressures. America could benefit from a Shenzhen/Goungzhou type of a economic free zone.
- Apocryphon 4y agoStartups, once sufficiently successful, also simply metamorphose into the the big corporations they displaced, witness FANG. (And even Apple itself, once built to challenge IBM's dominance.) Seems like this is all something inherent to the nature of power, regardless of the domain.
- systemvoltage 4y agoYeah, although inherent to nature would necessitate some kind of a proper death. Without it, these ancient goliaths linger around with no sense and no purpose (HP, IBM, etc).