4 ms·
I think it twitter's case it was architectural. By treating tweets as immutable the could publish them on a pipeline and not worry about duplicate copies aroun
by jedberg 4y ago
I think it twitter's case it was architectural. By treating tweets as immutable the could publish them on a pipeline and not worry about duplicate copies around the system being out of sync.
- mattnewton 4y agoThat and early on it used sms as one of the interfaces, which is not editable.
- jedberg 4y agoThey could always send another SMS with the edit. :) But yes, that too. The whole system was designed around SMS which couldn't be "unsent".