3 ms·
Something to consider. I once decided to see if a type of document existed—this being the internet, it was once amazing to me the things I thought might exist
by SllX 4y ago
Something to consider.
I once decided to see if a type of document existed—this being the internet, it was once amazing to me the things I thought might exist actually existing, maybe I should still be amazed—and the document I wanted to find was a “list of crimes” in my State. California does not (or did not) have such a list. I basically just wanted a number, and to see if there were any interesting ones I never thought of.
Massachusetts actually does have such a document, and while it isn’t my State and at this point I forgot the number, there were some interesting ones at the top that basically had to do with archaeology.
The US Department of Justice also doesn’t have such a list, just an FBI estimate at the time of >4,000 which means they don’t know either.
I wouldn’t call it a political position because that would require further research and more time than I’m willing to commit, but I would say I have a disposition towards reducing the total number of crimes on the books, which would mean compiling a list of what they are and consolidating and repealing many of them. If we can’t be bothered to know what they are in their totality, then we probably don’t need most of them.
- karmelapple 4y agoHere you go, the master crime list of Massachusetts: https://www.mass.gov/doc/master-crime-list/download https://www.mass.gov/doc/master-crime-list/download Here's one that seems similar for North Dakota: https://attorneygeneral.nd.gov/sites/ag/files/documents/OffenseCrossReference.pdf https://attorneygeneral.nd.gov/sites/ag/files/documents/Offe...