3 ms·
Obviously excluding yourself, I guess that means you spoke with 99 people all of which were scum, which strikes me as being fairly socially active for a fish ou
by rusk 4y ago
Obviously excluding yourself, I guess that means you spoke with 99 people all of which were scum, which strikes me as being fairly socially active for a fish out of water!
- i_like_apis 4y agoSounds like you're casting some sort of sarcastic doubt. I've mixed with a population of about 500. Spoken to many, intentionally and otherwise. Very familiar with their culture. Trust me, 99% of the arrest population is scum.
- skinnymuch 4y ago
- i_like_apis 4y ago> Interesting you said “their culture” when you are in that same in-group. No I am proudly not of the same culture (which is ignorant, violent, shoplifting heroine addicted, thieving, murdering, raping, etc ...). That should not be difficult to understand. ... did you just call me an "anti-other common folk boot licker"? 5/10 barely intelligible comment.
- skinnymuch 4y agoYeah I was on the subway. This is a basic casual comment convo. I have a learning disability that effects my talking and writing. Do I deserve to be mocked for that like your fellow jailmates? Why do a character attack of my writing? Even with the mistakes, it should not be difficult to understand if some one is fluent in English.
- i_like_apis 4y agoIt's obvious you are articulate and capable of writing whatever you would like to write. So I don't think you can shirk responsibility when it's convenient because you said something you shouldn't have. I'm getting a strong flamebait vibe here. Since your earlier comment with name-calling was also against HN policy, I'm flagging you here for whatever it's worth. PS: No intention of a back-and-forth here, but I happened to write a pretty long reply to one of your other comments before I saw this. Reply or not, it's no difference to me, but I'm sure we can agree to not flame if so.
- skinnymuch 4y agoHaha okay. I did nothing wrong.