3 ms·
I would guess the uptake will fall sharply somewhere around 10 million, which is still a life-changing amount of money for 99% of the population.
by ricardobeat 4y ago
I would guess the uptake will fall sharply somewhere around 10 million, which is still a life-changing amount of money for 99% of the population.
- stavros 4y agoHuh, it's very odd to me that you'd take an even chance of dying to win $10m... My amount would be much, much higher, potentially infinite.
- robocat 4y agoAny job that earns money has an implicit acceptable $ for death risk, because all jobs have a risk of death (proxy measurement of injury using ACC rates in New Zealand). Your sum risk might be reduced (e.g. your job pays health insurance), but many jobs increase your risk e.g. just driving to work is dangerous. Of course your primary finite resource is usually time (years of life), and your object function usually relates to quality of life (not $) . . . Win $ for risk of death is a poor metric.