3 ms·
> One of the human race’s biggest problems has been that people who occupy positions of power are often incapable of using power in a responsible way. > psycho
by nh23423fefe 4y ago
> One of the human race’s biggest problems has been that people who occupy positions of power are often incapable of using power in a responsible way.
> psychologist Clive Boddy has suggested that companies should screen leadership candidates for psychopathy. In my view, we should do something similar in politics. Every government (indeed every organisation) should employ psychologists to assess potential leaders and determine their suitability for power.
Is this even an idea? Sure its a sequence of words, but it is really an idea? If only "the right people" were "in power" everything would "be great."
Seems like a basic category error to assume things like positions of power exist that control and access can exist over a "position of power."
Why is the correct solution the identification of "good people" instead of actually incentivizing everyone to play emergent positive sum games. This fake idea of a kumbayah utopia the just pushes all the bad people away is nonsensical.
- rbanffy 4y agoEven in extremely hierarchical organisations (such as the military) one can call for an assessment of someone to make sure the person is still fit for power. Another option I’ve become very fond of is to criminalise lying when in power. The only excuse for lying on matters of public interest is national security. Any other lie or misrepresentation is a breach of trust and should disqualify the person from its position. We cannot afford to have public officials, elected or not, misrepresenting reality for their own agendas.
- nh23423fefe 4y agoWhat is the difference between a lie and misrepresentation? What happens when "their own agenda" aligns with the nation's? Trump said he withheld money from Ukraine because its corrupt. What happens there? Are you just going to say, "its obvious he is lying"