That is poor use of rhetorics. Because he didn't start it doesn't mean he didn't contribute to the development of the company. Also, no one can claim that suc

That is poor use of rhetorics. Because he didn't start it doesn't mean he didn't contribute to the development of the company. Also, no one can claim that success would have been at the doors without his input. Note: I'm not defending Musk here as much as I am opposing the rationale of the argument.