4 ms·
You can look up the 2008 banking issues from primary sources then. It's not controversial at all that JP Morgan Chase was basically the only solid bank when 200
by reducesuffering 4y ago
You can look up the 2008 banking issues from primary sources then. It's not controversial at all that JP Morgan Chase was basically the only solid bank when 2008 happened, in large part due to Dimon being practically the definition of an intellectual standup guy.
- wolverine876 4y ago> You can look up the 2008 banking issues from primary sources then. I think if someone is making a claim, it's up to them to support it. Wikipedia isn't great support. > Dimon being practically the definition of an intellectual standup guy. Dimon says a lot of BS.
- faeriechangling 4y agoYou're more critical of somebody claiming Jamie Dimon wasn't guilty for insufficiently supporting their argument despite citing an encyclopaedia, than you are the person who said "wasn't Jamie Dimon one of the individuals who was largely responsible for the last "economic hurricane"" Seems like quite the double standard. Sure, an argument based on Wikipedia isn't that strong, but he made a well supported argument relative to the rest of the thread and only he is getting crapped on. Even I made a less supported argument than he did.