4 ms·
The errors are bad, but understandable in 99% of cases with a little experience (like 2-3 weeks). And the stuff about the tooling is flat out wrong. The CLJS
by wry_discontent 4y ago
The errors are bad, but understandable in 99% of cases with a little experience (like 2-3 weeks).
And the stuff about the tooling is flat out wrong. The CLJS tooling is light years ahead of JS tooling in my experience. Maybe that was different back in the day, but shadow-cljs is seamless. Vastly superior to working with package.json/babelrc/postcssrc/webpack.config.js/etc/etc/etc
- lenkite 4y agoIf you are going to compare modern CLJS tooling against JS - you should also compare against modern JS tooling like esbuild/vitejs which operate at light-speed.