3 ms·
I have no reasons to doubt privacy statements but it rubs me the wrong way that I'm identifying myself by name to use search engine that's supposed not to track
by hericium 4y ago
I have no reasons to doubt privacy statements but it rubs me the wrong way that I'm identifying myself by name to use search engine that's supposed not to track me.
The requirement for an account also makes ad-hoc searching on whatever device/browser/profile tricky.
> You should pay for your search engine to ensure that the incentives of the information provider are aligned with what’s best for you, not what’s best for the advertisers.
DDG tends to show some search term-related ads but those seem quite harmless and aren't loaded from 3rd party sites.
> We care deeply about privacy.
Worthless statement. And quite annoying since most vendors start their privacy policies with similar calming statement which multiple paragraphs later is followed by "we'll give your data to advertisers"
That being said, Kagi looks interesting and I'll consider paying to try it out.
EDIT: media are loaded from AWS and browser sends a kagi_session cookie while grabbing them. kagi.com itself seems to be hosted on GCP. How am I supposed to trust any privacy assurances with this setup?
- april_22 4y agoThis. For me, it feels wrong entering my name and credit card details to be able to have a more private search experience. Especially since alternatives like SearX or You.com are at least as good as Kagi and don't have such requirements.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- lopis 4y ago> DDG tends to show some search term-related ads but those seem quite harmless and aren't loaded from 3rd party sites. Disclaimer, I work for Ecosia, but I have to agree. The one moment when I'm totally fine with seeing some ads is when I'm actually actively searching for something to buy and those ads are relevant to my query. What I don't want is my search queries in one site to stalk me around the whole web. Pretty much only disable uBlock in Ecosia and DDG.