What a short sighted response. I believe the original claim has substance behind and it was a very interesting non-trivial observation. Also, it proposes a ve

What a short sighted response. I believe the original claim has substance behind and it was a very interesting non-trivial observation. Also, it proposes a very exciting idea for an emergent phenomena that, if understood, could have deep consequences to our understanding of knowledge, language and a lot of other related topics.