2 ms·

It’s the other way around. ML is cool precisely because it’s a guitar for the mind, not a mind itself. https://soundcloud.com/theshawwn/sets/ai-generated-videog

It’s the other way around. ML is cool precisely because it’s a guitar for the mind, not a mind itself. https://soundcloud.com/theshawwn/sets/ai-generated-videogame-music https://soundcloud.com/theshawwn/sets/ai-generated-videogame... I made that by using ML as a guitar. I chose instruments and style the way a guitarist’s fingers chooses frets. And saying “give me this style with these instruments” is far easier than recording it yourself. For what it’s worth, I agree with you about AGI. https://twitter.com/theshawwn/status/1446076902607888385?s=21&t=jNnLLkDl2GlWQjorNlYMBw https://twitter.com/theshawwn/status/1446076902607888385?s=2... But for me, that means it’s far more interesting than AGI. Everyone has their eye on AGI, and no one seems to be taking ML at face value. That means the first companies to do it will stand to make a fortune.

deltaonefour 4y ago
Why do people use analogies to prove a point? It doesn't prove anything. What was your point here? ML is like a guitar? What you said doesn't seem to contradict anything I said other then you find curve fitting interesting and I don't. Not trying to be offensive here, don't take it the wrong way. On a side note your music example also basically destroys the question of what is music? Well the answer to that question is that music is the set of all points on some sort of N-dimensional curve. The profoundness of the question is completely gone.