> if everyone wants to pay a bunch of money to go see Lewis Hamilton race, thereby enriching Lewis and producing an unequal distribution of goods, can we reason

> if everyone wants to pay a bunch of money to go see Lewis Hamilton race, thereby enriching Lewis and producing an unequal distribution of goods, can we reasonably say this situation is unjust? I think we can. The individuals involved in the transaction all consent to it, but they are not the only ones affected. Lewis Hamilton being rich (beyond a certain level) has a detrimental affect on all in society as it undermines the market system we rely on to drive our economy towards productive ends.