3 ms·

The tooling is far from simplistic to setup and the available options can be overwhelming. Its all the pain of the JS stack but with less easily available help

The tooling is far from simplistic to setup and the available options can be overwhelming. Its all the pain of the JS stack but with less easily available help and tooling that produces less helpful error messages.

CraigJPerry 4y ago
I don’t think it’s that $ npx nbb -e (println "Hello, world") Need to install the following packages: nbb Ok to proceed? (y) Hello, world Or more comprehensively: https://clojurescript.org/guides/quick-start https://clojurescript.org/guides/quick-start
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- Deadron 4y ago
  Your example is missing anything actually related to rendering a webpage.
  - capableweb 4y ago
    Unclear what "rendering a webpage" entails exactly. If you want to do frontend development, you can give shadow-cljs a try, the quickstart is pretty quick: https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs#quick-start https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs#quick-start If you want to just render server-side HTML, something like compojure (HTTP routing) and hiccup (Clojure data -> HTML) is pretty easy and quick to get started with (https://gist.github.com/zehnpaard/2071c3f55ed319aa8528d54d90f557e3 https://gist.github.com/zehnpaard/2071c3f55ed319aa8528d54d90...). If you want to generate HTML files to serve with nginx/whatever, you can just use hiccup and `(spit)` the resulting HTML to files on disk.
didibus 4y ago
I think the tooling nowadays is pretty simple to setup, but the information out there doesn't speak to that new simple way, so everyone starting is following something that pushes them to outdated tooling. Install Java: brew tap homebrew/cask-versions brew install --cask temurin17 Install Clojure: brew install clojure/tools/clojure Type `clj` at the command line and play with Clojure! Now install VSCode and get the Calva plugin for Clojure from the marketplace. That's it. You'll have autocompletion, jump to definition, code formatting and highlighting, linting, support for editor integrated REPL, debugger, etc. Then you can run: clojure -Ttools install io.github.seancorfield/deps-new '{:git/tag "v0.4.9"}' :as new And now you can create new projects from various templates using: clojure -Tnew app :name myusername/mynewapp This creates a new basic application project for example. Open it in VSCode and you can connect a REPL to it and start working.
wry_discontent 4y ago
The errors are bad, but understandable in 99% of cases with a little experience (like 2-3 weeks). And the stuff about the tooling is flat out wrong. The CLJS tooling is light years ahead of JS tooling in my experience. Maybe that was different back in the day, but shadow-cljs is seamless. Vastly superior to working with package.json/babelrc/postcssrc/webpack.config.js/etc/etc/etc
- lenkite 4y ago
  If you are going to compare modern CLJS tooling against JS - you should also compare against modern JS tooling like esbuild/vitejs which operate at light-speed.

CraigJPerry 4y ago

I don’t think it’s that $ npx nbb -e (println "Hello, world") Need to install the following packages: nbb Ok to proceed? (y) Hello, world Or more comprehensively: https://clojurescript.org/guides/quick-start https://clojurescript.org/guides/quick-start

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
Deadron 4y ago
Your example is missing anything actually related to rendering a webpage.
- capableweb 4y ago
  Unclear what "rendering a webpage" entails exactly. If you want to do frontend development, you can give shadow-cljs a try, the quickstart is pretty quick: https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs#quick-start https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs#quick-start If you want to just render server-side HTML, something like compojure (HTTP routing) and hiccup (Clojure data -> HTML) is pretty easy and quick to get started with (https://gist.github.com/zehnpaard/2071c3f55ed319aa8528d54d90f557e3 https://gist.github.com/zehnpaard/2071c3f55ed319aa8528d54d90...). If you want to generate HTML files to serve with nginx/whatever, you can just use hiccup and `(spit)` the resulting HTML to files on disk.

didibus 4y ago

I think the tooling nowadays is pretty simple to setup, but the information out there doesn't speak to that new simple way, so everyone starting is following something that pushes them to outdated tooling. Install Java: brew tap homebrew/cask-versions brew install --cask temurin17 Install Clojure: brew install clojure/tools/clojure Type `clj` at the command line and play with Clojure! Now install VSCode and get the Calva plugin for Clojure from the marketplace. That's it. You'll have autocompletion, jump to definition, code formatting and highlighting, linting, support for editor integrated REPL, debugger, etc. Then you can run: clojure -Ttools install io.github.seancorfield/deps-new '{:git/tag "v0.4.9"}' :as new And now you can create new projects from various templates using: clojure -Tnew app :name myusername/mynewapp This creates a new basic application project for example. Open it in VSCode and you can connect a REPL to it and start working.

wry_discontent 4y ago

The errors are bad, but understandable in 99% of cases with a little experience (like 2-3 weeks). And the stuff about the tooling is flat out wrong. The CLJS tooling is light years ahead of JS tooling in my experience. Maybe that was different back in the day, but shadow-cljs is seamless. Vastly superior to working with package.json/babelrc/postcssrc/webpack.config.js/etc/etc/etc

lenkite 4y ago
If you are going to compare modern CLJS tooling against JS - you should also compare against modern JS tooling like esbuild/vitejs which operate at light-speed.