To be clear, personally I think a world in which everyone has less but no one has none is, on a moral level, a better world. If this is a fair example of Rawls'

To be clear, personally I think a world in which everyone has less but no one has none is, on a moral level, a better world. If this is a fair example of Rawls' thought, then I'm with Rawls, and am not a utilitarian.