3 ms·
Not op, but I did use Handbrake multiple times, and thinking of just going back to cli ffmpeg. I wanted to see the exact incantation of ffmpeg that Handbrake is
by radicality 4y ago
Not op, but I did use Handbrake multiple times, and thinking of just going back to cli ffmpeg. I wanted to see the exact incantation of ffmpeg that Handbrake issues to more easily switch, but from what I saw it doesn't fork into an ffmpeg process but probably uses the library, and it's hard to tell what the exact params are.
My problem with Handbrake was that it wasn't correctly copying creation datetime/makernotes/camera info into the new video and I had to manually later on issue bunch of ffmpeg commands for copying stream metadata, at which point I might as well do the whole conversion directly in ffmpeg.
- cm2187 4y agoThe thing is depend what you are trying to do. To compress DVD/Blurays, I find handbrake invaluable, because it will automatically deal all kind of weird corner cases in term of pixel format, image ratio, cropping, deinterlacing, etc, that I don't have to write in a command line on every new file (and every disk seems to be doing something different). But if you are dealing with repeatable, consistent file format (like files coming from the same camera), you are way better off going the command line route, and chances are the command will be pretty simple.
- orlp 4y agoMy main gripe with Handbrake is how annoying it is to trim a video. There's no preview of when the trim happens. And for some unknown reason it defaults to a chapter range rather than seconds or frames for trimming...