2 ms·
With a 3/4 majority in the legislature and the governor, you have to wonder why Democrats can't just amend the law instead of relying on such a strained interpr
by tomohawk 4y ago
With a 3/4 majority in the legislature and the governor, you have to wonder why Democrats can't just amend the law instead of relying on such a strained interpretation by judges.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> strained interpretation by judges. It's not, it's literally the definition in the law in black and white. Now, the law has a very strange definition of “fish”, but it very expressly includes, among other things, any inverterbrate. The only reason the court also looked to other indicia was to see if there was evidence that the express text was intended to be more limited than it appears on its face, such as to only apply to aquatic invertebrates.