4 ms·
Real problem is that this is political question. For human rights all simple - all people must have possibility to protect their rights to life, liberty and pr
by simne 4y ago
Real problem is that this is political question.
For human rights all simple - all people must have possibility to protect their rights to life, liberty and property, and in real life, mister Colt is best friend of adequate citizen.
So limitations on civil guns are limitations of people rights.
It is adequate to limit rights on guns for felons and for incapable persons, these are only exceptions.
- iostream24 4y agoHow do you feel about personal MLRS’s? Short range is sufficient but why limit peoples civil rights so severely. The people demand pocket ICBMs now. Anything less is tyranny.
- simne 4y agoYour text is spam. You spent community resources on spam. This is offense in many countries. So next time try to create something valuable.
- iostream24 4y agoIncapable people demand automatic self firing self ranging self targeting weapons now! If self driving cars are ok, surely no one can object to self programming terminator bots, it’s using lisp macros so surely HN loves it eh? We can train it on Fox News. What could possibly go wrong?
- simne 4y ago> Incapable people demand automatic self firing self ranging self targeting weapons now! Do it. Now such tech not exist, so nonsense demand it. > it’s using lisp macros so surely HN loves it eh? No, it is not. Now does not exist any machine with self cognition, and all self-targeting weapons considered as objects, not subjects. If you will create self cognitios machine, this discussion will have sense, but before - non sense.