4 ms·
Leaving the house mortgaged is a reasonable and prudent decision, particularly at the rock-bottom interest rates of the past N years. The size of the house may
by fennecfoxen 4y ago
Leaving the house mortgaged is a reasonable and prudent decision, particularly at the rock-bottom interest rates of the past N years. The size of the house may be excessive, on the other hand -- most of the returns on a large home are not investment returns, but rather a form of consumption -- and the purchase of a boat, financed or otherwise, was probably the real five-or-six-figure mistake.
I made $500k last year (selling 1.5 years' of equity compensation near the top of the market) and I'm celebrating with a brand new mortgage and a car, but my monthly payment on both will be lower than what I was paying in rent, inflation is eroding the value of my mortgage debt. A conforming loan of $647,200 at 4% is an inflation hedge with a rate of return around $2000/mo, or ~60% of the mortgage payment.
The car is going to be used (real interest rate around -4% to 0%, details TBD). Boat? Maybe a kayak or canoe. :)
- omginternets 4y agoWhat I consider to be imprudent is not the use of debt itself, but the use of debt as a tool for living beyond one's means.
- ryathal 4y agoThe problem is generally those that believe debt is an investment. It's like believing professional gambler is a long term profession. People don't get rich taking out debt, banks do. You can beat the house once in a while, but you aren't winning over a lifetime of buying things with debt. 2-3 targeted purchases, you can win, a lifetime of car payments and you lost a ton.