3 ms·
I don’t think those are in conflict: scale has a quality all its own. I’m not claiming AI have anything similar to human psychology, just that the insistence t
by zmgsabst 4y ago
I don’t think those are in conflict: scale has a quality all its own.
I’m not claiming AI have anything similar to human psychology, just that the insistence they have zero “intelligence” is in conflict with how we use that word to describe animals: they’re clearly somewhere between bees/ants and dogs.
- TaupeRanger 4y agoThe conflict is that, at one point (the Python program) there are no qualities - just behaviors, but at some point the qualities (which are distinct phenomena) somehow enter in, when all that has been added in physical terms is more matter and energy.
- ImPostingOnHN 4y agowe are what we do: qualities are just a characterization of known behavior
- TaupeRanger 4y agoThat's quite handwave-y. What special magic does a human mind use to obtain qualities that a Python program doing linear algebra can't access? Both have "characterizations of known behavior".
- ImPostingOnHN 4y agoyes, that sounds correct in my opinion I don't think I said anything which disagrees with such a valid analysis that there's nothing special about one or the other