The hubris in thinking technology is good enough to eavesdrop - but not good enough to circumvent a published research technique to overcome it - is palpable. B

The hubris in thinking technology is good enough to eavesdrop - but not good enough to circumvent a published research technique to overcome it - is palpable. Besides, is the way to solve the eavesdropping problem really to put more "AI" devices in the home, or to be frank about their implications and remove them entirely?