4 ms·
Suggesting that anyone who uses meth must have a general disregard for the law is just prejudice. It's perfectly rational to think that the law against meth us
by dkjaudyeqooe 4y ago
Suggesting that anyone who uses meth must have a general disregard for the law is just prejudice.
It's perfectly rational to think that the law against meth use is unjust while being otherwise law abiding. Most people would consider drug use an issue of personal freedom.
- itsoktocry 4y ago>It's perfectly rational to think that the law against meth use is unjust while being otherwise law abiding. "Otherwise law abiding"? That makes no sense. If you're considered law abiding by following only the laws you consider "just", then everyone is law abiding. Law abiding literally means you follow the laws.
- oneoff786 4y agoI would love to meet this person who wants to try meth, believes laws against possession of meth are unjust, and yet still follows them.
- landemva 4y ago>> Most people would consider drug use an issue of personal freedom. Not Trudeau or Biden. USA's OSHA attempted to mandate use of a new drug. Canada still requires use of the new drug to visit or live there. Most of EU-country vaccine drug mandates expired June 1, and OSHA lost their court case months ago.