> Implying that a male researcher launched some kind of inappropriate sexed attack by criticising their work is thoroughly bizarre to me. They’re not implying

> Implying that a male researcher launched some kind of inappropriate sexed attack by criticising their work is thoroughly bizarre to me. They’re not implying it they are outright claiming that was his motivation for not letting it drop before he got fired. Most reasonable people would just stop when told “dude, you’re gonna get fired if you keep it up” but some people just can’t do that for whatever reason. Either way they decided back in the 70s women don’t have to deal with harassment as part of their job and whatever your opinion on how this is enforced it is pure and simple fact you will be fired over a corporation going to the mat to defend you against accusations related to this. Well, unless you’re a CEO of one of the Silicon Valley unicorns then you can do whatever you want.