3 ms·
In particular, there's a fundamental constraint we need to remember: in order for people to buy things with their wages, those things must be produced. That is
by makomk 4y ago
In particular, there's a fundamental constraint we need to remember: in order for people to buy things with their wages, those things must be produced. That is to say, it's not possible for businesses across the economy to just decide to pay everyone better in real, inflation-adjusted terms of what they can actually afford to buy with their income and make everyone better off, because that doesn't magically make more stuff spring into existence to purchase.
There's a kind of thinking I see a lot in these threads where there's no labour shortage, businesses just need to pay better and if they don't then they don't deserve to continue existing as a business, framing this as evil businesses jsut complaining about not being able to keep their non-viable business models going anymore. The thing is, this misses the other side: a lot of those businesses produce stuff that consumers want, and if they're no longer viable any more then that consumer demand cannot be filled at the price people were willing to pay, again decreasing the value of people's income in real what-they-can-buy terms.
- verve_rat 4y agoSure, but those business could take reduced profits. No extra money needed, just a redistribution, if you will.
- ghaff 4y agoIn many cases, especially small businesses, there may not be sufficient profits to spread around. At some point on the price scale, a lot of restaurants just aren't going to have customers. And how many people will be willing to take an Uber if it costs $10/minute?