6 ms·
Well this is just a matter of taking strict or large inequality by default. It is true that in french speech, inequality is large by default, while it is strict
by lapinot 4y ago
Well this is just a matter of taking strict or large inequality by default. It is true that in french speech, inequality is large by default, while it is strict by default in english. Personally i prefer the french convention because i prefer the phrase "strictly less than" to "less than or equal to". In fact that phrase preference must be somewhat consensual since the usual way to talk about large inequality in english (at least when comparing to 0) is to talk about the negation of the converse relation ("not greater than").
This is why we have symbolic notations.
- nousermane 4y agoDoes that "large inequality" apply to symbolics in french literature as well? Or the same "≤" (U+2264) is used as in english?
- lapinot 4y agoNo the same symbol is used (fortunately)! Btw i just realized that i weirdly translated "non-strict" as "large" (in french we say "large" which actually translates to "wide"). edit: surely you meant ⩽ (U+2A7D) ;)