3 ms·
Judges can also be wrong. That's what appeal courts are for. That case in front of that judge is not the be-all-end-all of what is correct. Do you think OJ Simp
by ThatPlayer 4y ago
Judges can also be wrong. That's what appeal courts are for. That case in front of that judge is not the be-all-end-all of what is correct. Do you think OJ Simpson didn't do it because he was found not guilty? There's a reason criminal verdict are phrased as 'not guilty', not 'innocent'.
- scarface74 4y agoSo now the judges are wrong and not random people on HN?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ThatPlayer 4y agoIt is a possibility. Should I accept a judge's decision because it's a judge's decision? Or should I use my own critical thinking about a topic to decide? And in this case the judge's decision was that Epic didn't prove it was a monopoly, not that it wasn't. So therefore "it is a monopoly" doesn't contradict that, and both can be correct. So neither are wrong.
- scarface74 4y agoWhen it comes to a law, yes you should accept a judges decision where a case was unsuccessful argued by high priced experts in the law.