3 ms·
It’s not hypothetical that a person would buy a pickup truck and expect to use it at all, heheh. You chose to reframe it as “the person is exclusively relying o
by no-s 4y ago
It’s not hypothetical that a person would buy a pickup truck and expect to use it at all, heheh. You chose to reframe it as “the person is exclusively relying on this grid-tied vehicle for all their transportation needs as well”, which is framing an argument I did not make. I think that’s some kind of rhetorical fallacy on your part.
Please help me to recontextualize such an inane counter. It’s like you have no response at all and just reframe things so you’ll have something to refute.
That’s dishearteningly dishonest for HN.
- pengaru 4y ago> Please help me to recontextualize such an inane counter. It’s like you have no response at all and just reframe things so you’ll have something to refute. > > That’s dishearteningly dishonest for HN. I'm the one being dishonest? To attack the conversation itself when you can no longer substantiate your view is a bad faith technique as old as the hills.