5 ms·
This is just completely wrong. Just from personal experience I can say that Tokyo, Amsterdam, Paris, and Florence are perfectly livable without a car.
by usednet 4y ago
This is just completely wrong. Just from personal experience I can say that Tokyo, Amsterdam, Paris, and Florence are perfectly livable without a car.
- ThunderSizzle 4y agoNow list 4 american cities you can live in without a car?
- jjulius 4y agoChicago, Seattle, San Francisco, New York
- whateveracct 4y agoAll those cities are way better with a car. How do you plan to get to Rainier?
- jjulius 4y agoIs there supposed to be a "/s" here? Whether or not those cities are "better with a car" doesn't really matter here. OP was asking what "cities you can live in without a car", and you can do that in all four of those (I've done so in Seattle and San Francisco). Whether or not you love to do it doesn't change the fact that it's perfectly possible. And Mt. Rainier? Really? Again - the question was whether or not you can live in a city without a car. Rainier is two hours outside of the city, so it's not even a part of the question.
- toomuchtodo 4y agoWould also go so far as to put forth any college town with a climate where a bicycle will get you around most of the year without dying from freezing to death or heat exhaustion.
- presentation 4y agoSo the point is that US cities suck?
- WastingMyTime89 4y agoI don’t know anyone who owns a car in Paris. The TCO is just stupid. People just rent one when they need it.