8 ms·
Could you expand on why that confidentiality requirement is in place? Is it a requirement from some of your parts suppliers? Is it a self-imposed constraint fo
by ncallaway 4y ago
Could you expand on why that confidentiality requirement is in place?
Is it a requirement from some of your parts suppliers? Is it a self-imposed constraint for internal business reasons?
- desiarnezjr 4y agoI'd bet that some companies in Shenzhen would clone the components quickly. If there's money in it. Clone Framework boards and parts.
- netr0ute 4y agoIs that a bad thing?
- spaetzleesser 4y agoDefinitely for Framework.
- SeanLuke 4y agoOf course it is a bad thing. Framework is not a nonprofit. They spent blood and tears developing the designs, and needs to at least recoup the cost spent, if not make a profit.
- netr0ute 4y agoWhat about FOSH companies?
- jeroenhd 4y agoIt would be a great thing for consumers. That's how we got the PC industry in the first place. It'd be bad for Framework though.
- userbinator 4y agoThose companies probably already have access to the same reference designs that Framework (or more likely their ODM/OEM) has.
- infogulch 4y agoLouis describes talking to the founder about their reasons, but it was in confidence so he doesn't really say much. https://youtu.be/G2YjKYG8P58?t=50 https://youtu.be/G2YjKYG8P58?t=50 (just watch the whole thing it's only 3m) > it really did show me that a lot needs to change throughout the entire industry ... I respect and understand why they have the concerns that they do, they are real concerns ... If Louis was convinced that there were valid reasons not to publish the schematics then somehow I doubt it is as simple as Chinese copycat manufacturers, but who knows.