Quite common. Usually someone develops a remote or mixed local/remote development environment which is easier to use than configuring the full stack to run loc

Quite common. Usually someone develops a remote or mixed local/remote development environment which is easier to use than configuring the full stack to run locally, and then the ability to ever do so again atrophies until nobody can figure out how anymore. In some companies I've worked at this is fine and not a major setback. In others, it's been a mess. I don't think that "can run the stack locally" is a good litmus test for developer experience - the overall development experience is a lot more nuanced than that. "How long does it take to get going again if you replace your computer" and "what's the turnaround time to alter a single line of code" are usually better questions.