4 ms·

"Out of time to avert climate disaster" means beyond the point of no return where no reasonable act can reverse it. It does not mean we are suffering from extre

"Out of time to avert climate disaster" means beyond the point of no return where no reasonable act can reverse it. It does not mean we are suffering from extreme consequences currently..

core-utility 4y ago
I still stand by my point.
- sodality2 4y ago
  "How many times can we be running out of time before it's reasonable to be doubtful of the message? I think there have been at least 4 "end of the world" scenarios in my rather short lifetime and there's always a new proposed date after each one is proven false." It can be compared to, "How many times can we change the solar system model before it's reasonable to be doubtful of the message? I think there have been at least 4 changes in what we believe to be the center of our universe in my rather short lifetime and there's always a new proposed center after each one is proven false." It is a science. It is scientifically proven that the damage we have done to our climate is going to eventually cause very bad consequences. The only question is when, which is very difficult to pin down with constantly changing conditions. It's like trying to identify when the next tornado will hit. You don't know precisely when, you might have some false positives, but you know it will happen. You don't get to say, "Well this is the fifth time the meteorologist has told me to evacuate, I have reason to believe this is politically motivated".
ryandrake 4y ago
I think what parent is getting at is: Year after year, we're always only a few years away from Climate Change being irreversible. The constant "We're almost beyond the point of no return, but not quite" declarations remind me of the Truck Almost Hits A Pole meme[1]. Or like preachers predicting "Jesus's return is just around the corner" every year for the last 2000 years. At some point message fatigue sets in and you start tuning it out. I know it's impossible to predict exactly when that point is, but why is it always "a few years away"? 1: https://imgur.com/r/gifs/kuplW0m https://imgur.com/r/gifs/kuplW0m
- guerrilla 4y ago
  It's not a few years away, you're just confounding different messages. It's past the point of no return for 1C and for getting extreme weather. NOW what's not that far away is 1.5C.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
misslibby 4y ago
There were many claims that we would be suffering from extreme consequences by now already, zero of which have materialized. That is not to say that ALL predictions are necessarily wrong, but enough to be wary of the fear mongering. Especially since dramatic predictions probably yield more government money.
- wing-_-nuts 4y ago
  >zero of which have materialized. Uh, really? There are any number of natural disasters that have been made many times worse by climate change, but ignorance is bliss I guess...

"Out of time to avert climate disaster" means beyond the point of no return where no reasonable act can reverse it. It does not mean we are suffering from extreme consequences currently..

core-utility 4y ago

I still stand by my point.

sodality2 4y ago
"How many times can we be running out of time before it's reasonable to be doubtful of the message? I think there have been at least 4 "end of the world" scenarios in my rather short lifetime and there's always a new proposed date after each one is proven false." It can be compared to, "How many times can we change the solar system model before it's reasonable to be doubtful of the message? I think there have been at least 4 changes in what we believe to be the center of our universe in my rather short lifetime and there's always a new proposed center after each one is proven false." It is a science. It is scientifically proven that the damage we have done to our climate is going to eventually cause very bad consequences. The only question is when, which is very difficult to pin down with constantly changing conditions. It's like trying to identify when the next tornado will hit. You don't know precisely when, you might have some false positives, but you know it will happen. You don't get to say, "Well this is the fifth time the meteorologist has told me to evacuate, I have reason to believe this is politically motivated".

ryandrake 4y ago

I think what parent is getting at is: Year after year, we're always only a few years away from Climate Change being irreversible. The constant "We're almost beyond the point of no return, but not quite" declarations remind me of the Truck Almost Hits A Pole meme[1]. Or like preachers predicting "Jesus's return is just around the corner" every year for the last 2000 years. At some point message fatigue sets in and you start tuning it out. I know it's impossible to predict exactly when that point is, but why is it always "a few years away"? 1: https://imgur.com/r/gifs/kuplW0m https://imgur.com/r/gifs/kuplW0m

guerrilla 4y ago
It's not a few years away, you're just confounding different messages. It's past the point of no return for 1C and for getting extreme weather. NOW what's not that far away is 1.5C.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]

misslibby 4y ago

There were many claims that we would be suffering from extreme consequences by now already, zero of which have materialized. That is not to say that ALL predictions are necessarily wrong, but enough to be wary of the fear mongering. Especially since dramatic predictions probably yield more government money.

wing-_-nuts 4y ago
>zero of which have materialized. Uh, really? There are any number of natural disasters that have been made many times worse by climate change, but ignorance is bliss I guess...