4 ms·

It will depend on so many factors. Our current accredited investors are getting about 10%+, but that's only because they have access to tax equity benefits. We

It will depend on so many factors. Our current accredited investors are getting about 10%+, but that's only because they have access to tax equity benefits. We are still in an early stage of creating the financial product, and the realized returns will be a function of the risk profile we choose (i.e. will there be construction risk, insurance, who is the power purchaser, etc.) Don't worry, you'll get a detailed financial profile/pro forma before you have to make a investment decision.

foobiekr 4y ago
So let me get this straight. You are soliciting engagement and don’t even have the financials worked out?
- yepnopemaybe 4y ago
  I'd say we are 80% of the way there - every solar facility will have different traits and economics as an investment. We have the legal infrastructure and finance partners to make it happen pretty quick. As with any investment, we can't make claims about financials until everything is finalized and vetted. That will have to wait until we have a pro forma ready to go. Soliciting 'indications of interest' is a fairly common practice across all industries. To be clear, we are already financing larger $100K+ deals with friendly investors in our network as we design and engineer a product for a larger audience.
  - esses 4y ago
    You are soliciting "indications of interest" with an estimated 7.3% yield with no justification whatsoever on the site to back it up.
    - yepnopemaybe 4y ago
      That's why it's 'no commitment', but I would not set exceptions at 7.3% if I did not expect the product to be at or near that number. Our accredited investors do better, but again, that's with tax equity.
      - esses 4y ago
        Without explaining your expectations that 7.3 number is nothing more than wishful thinking to someone that might be interested in your product. On top of that, your accredited investors have a short track record of returns and do not reflect the product you are soliciting - you admit it isn’t the same return structure. Without showing your work you are going to have a hard time convincing someone this is worthy of a commitment.

foobiekr 4y ago

So let me get this straight. You are soliciting engagement and don’t even have the financials worked out?

yepnopemaybe 4y ago
I'd say we are 80% of the way there - every solar facility will have different traits and economics as an investment. We have the legal infrastructure and finance partners to make it happen pretty quick. As with any investment, we can't make claims about financials until everything is finalized and vetted. That will have to wait until we have a pro forma ready to go. Soliciting 'indications of interest' is a fairly common practice across all industries. To be clear, we are already financing larger $100K+ deals with friendly investors in our network as we design and engineer a product for a larger audience.
- esses 4y ago
  You are soliciting "indications of interest" with an estimated 7.3% yield with no justification whatsoever on the site to back it up.
  - yepnopemaybe 4y ago
    That's why it's 'no commitment', but I would not set exceptions at 7.3% if I did not expect the product to be at or near that number. Our accredited investors do better, but again, that's with tax equity.
    - esses 4y ago
      Without explaining your expectations that 7.3 number is nothing more than wishful thinking to someone that might be interested in your product. On top of that, your accredited investors have a short track record of returns and do not reflect the product you are soliciting - you admit it isn’t the same return structure. Without showing your work you are going to have a hard time convincing someone this is worthy of a commitment.