This was actually pointed out in the "peer" (laughable to call it that) review of the paper. The data this rag was based on was flawed from the start. > You sh

This was actually pointed out in the "peer" (laughable to call it that) review of the paper. The data this rag was based on was flawed from the start. > You should use the term ‘sex’ rather than ’gender’, because your use of categories (male vs. female) indicates it is biological sex you are considering. In fact, you inconsistently use sex 20 times and gender 20 times in the ms. > The problem is tricky because our survey used the term gender rather than sex. We have only used the term gender when referring to the survey questions and have explained why in a footnote at the start of the survey section. We forgot to explain that we had made this change in our last communication with the reviewer, but we hope you find this approach reasonable. Admittedly, a few other ‘genders’ were added by accident in past reviews.