3 ms·

It's not that programs don't elevate all possible gifted children. It's that their definition of 'gifted' is not reliable, and it's likely to be conflating 'gif

It's not that programs don't elevate all possible gifted children. It's that their definition of 'gifted' is not reliable, and it's likely to be conflating 'gifted' with 'advantaged'. Are you actually identifying gifted children, or just well-fed ones with supportive parents who have the same cultural background as you? Duke's TIP program (and similar) don't limit themselves to just identification of gifted children. > Duke has a long history of providing opportunities for talented middle and high school students to gain exposure to rigorous academic coursework and to communities of talented peers. Many of these opportunities were facilitated by Duke TIP, which was established in 1980 and provided valuable academic enrichment opportunities for several generations of pre-college students. Duke Youth Programs has also provided a range of engaging summer programs for more than 20 years. [1] Again, that's not rigorously identifying gifted children so much as it is asserting that some children are gifted and then doing a lot of work to ensure that they get better advantages/opportunities than others. We don't have anything like enough evidence to claim that they are successful in their identification, or that the students would have achieved similarly on their own. [1] https://tip.duke.edu/ https://tip.duke.edu/

astrange 4y ago
I seem to remember qualifying for TIP and then not doing it because my parents thought it'd be too expensive. So it's unclear how aggressive that helping was.
DarylZero 4y ago
> ensure that they get better advantages/opportunities than others Gifted kids don't even need "better advantages" -- just either give them appropriate level material, or at least don't force them to do inappropriate material. They used to let kids skip grades. Nothing "better" than anyone else, just the exact same thing earlier. Recognizing their actual abilities rather than declaring that their abilities are determined by age.
- AussieWog93 4y ago
  >They used to let kids skip grades. Nothing "better" than anyone else, just the exact same thing earlier. Recognizing their actual abilities rather than declaring that their abilities are determined by age. From what I understand, a big part of why this is discouraged now is because kids that are ready academically aren't necessarily ready socially - especially considering they'd be breaking into a new group.
  - DarylZero 4y ago
    That's the standard line. Don't let it be a thought-terminating cliche though. There's no solution to the problem there. Maybe question the idea of strict social segregation of children by age, social segregation of children by academic status, etc.
AussieWog93 4y ago
>Are you actually identifying gifted children, or just well-fed ones with supportive parents who have the same cultural background as you? In all seriousness, why should this matter? If a kid hypothetically couldn't handle a "gifted" workload were they to come from a bad family, that shouldn't stop them from being given opportunities. Similarly, if a kid is failing academically because their parents mock their achievements, is that something the school can fix? Either the kids can work at that higher level or they can't. I don't see the point of dragging down kids who could achieve more because others have bad home lives.
- freemint 4y ago
  Distinguishing gifted from non gifted children with coaching is relatively easy by just leaving the sphere of things that might have been cristalized into children and observing the fluid intelligence.

astrange 4y ago

I seem to remember qualifying for TIP and then not doing it because my parents thought it'd be too expensive. So it's unclear how aggressive that helping was.

DarylZero 4y ago

> ensure that they get better advantages/opportunities than others Gifted kids don't even need "better advantages" -- just either give them appropriate level material, or at least don't force them to do inappropriate material. They used to let kids skip grades. Nothing "better" than anyone else, just the exact same thing earlier. Recognizing their actual abilities rather than declaring that their abilities are determined by age.

AussieWog93 4y ago
>They used to let kids skip grades. Nothing "better" than anyone else, just the exact same thing earlier. Recognizing their actual abilities rather than declaring that their abilities are determined by age. From what I understand, a big part of why this is discouraged now is because kids that are ready academically aren't necessarily ready socially - especially considering they'd be breaking into a new group.
- DarylZero 4y ago
  That's the standard line. Don't let it be a thought-terminating cliche though. There's no solution to the problem there. Maybe question the idea of strict social segregation of children by age, social segregation of children by academic status, etc.

AussieWog93 4y ago

>Are you actually identifying gifted children, or just well-fed ones with supportive parents who have the same cultural background as you? In all seriousness, why should this matter? If a kid hypothetically couldn't handle a "gifted" workload were they to come from a bad family, that shouldn't stop them from being given opportunities. Similarly, if a kid is failing academically because their parents mock their achievements, is that something the school can fix? Either the kids can work at that higher level or they can't. I don't see the point of dragging down kids who could achieve more because others have bad home lives.

freemint 4y ago
Distinguishing gifted from non gifted children with coaching is relatively easy by just leaving the sphere of things that might have been cristalized into children and observing the fluid intelligence.