9 ms·
Maybe you should put forward an affirmative argument of non-existence or continuity with the past, etc. Otherwise, you are just asserting formless skepticism --
by nh23423fefe 4y ago
Maybe you should put forward an affirmative argument of non-existence or continuity with the past, etc. Otherwise, you are just asserting formless skepticism -- with no evidence.
- JasonFruit 4y agoSkepticism is appropriate when there's no evidence, in general. No opinion on this matter.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- NikolaNovak 4y agoHmm; I think of it more as the null hypothesis - it is the alternative/proposed hypothesis that would need evidence in my mind. I.e. my daily necessary-for-sanity assumption is that 10 million gazillion things are pretty much the same today as yesterday; if a headline/claim is "This thing has changed/Occurred!", that is what needs evidence in order for claim to be relevant/substantiated/interesting.
- JoeAltmaier 4y agoOr just google it.
- mcnamaratw 4y agoDo you have any evidence of this?