Hi HN! I'm the author of the piece referenced in this Logseq post. > Logseq easily ticks the boxes [Navigability, Organizability, Transformability, and Extensi

Hi HN! I'm the author of the piece referenced in this Logseq post. > Logseq easily ticks the boxes [Navigability, Organizability, Transformability, and Extensibility] of this ITE framework, but it’s still early days in this new category of tools. The requirements will evolve rapidly, and the framework will inevitably need to be revised. I totally agree with the need for revision. I actually thought the NOTE framework was the weakest part of my original article [1]... would love to hear some alternative takes on a design theory for ITEs. [1]: https://axle.design/obsidian-roam-and-the-rise-of-integrated-thinking-environments https://axle.design/obsidian-roam-and-the-rise-of-integrated...