4 ms·

Would have been more Pythonic as: if one_or_none() as foo: do_stuff(foo)

• aix1 4y ago
  I didn't recognize this use of "as" as valid Python, but tried it in 3.9 just to be sure. Got a syntax error (as expected). I am not fully up to speed with 3.10, but quickly checked the docs and it doesn't appear to have been added in 3.10 either. Let me know if I'm missing something.
  • digisign 4y ago
    Oh, "would have" meaning python-dev chose a different spelling. Not, as in it would-have been better if the example was written this way.
    • aix1 4y ago
      Oh, I see now. Thanks for the clarification.