4 ms·

I've never used it. What's wrong with it?

by brink 4y ago

cocolos 4y ago
UI is not great.
- capableweb 4y ago
  First time I used it, it was a bit confusing, as I didn't really know what to expect. Is it email? Live chat? A forum? Turns out, it's a bit of both, and trying to use it as any single one of them, will probably make it harder to use. Basically, I treat it as a live chat where it's easier to participate in different topics at the same time, Slack on steroids where everything is a "Thread" basically.
  - distances 4y ago
    Sounds similar to Flowdock model? I greatly preferred that and was so disappointed when Slack finally rolled out their version of threading. It felt almost useless in comparison. Alas, Flowdock is dead now and I've learned to embrace Slack as the better remaining alternative over Teams or Google Chat.
- drwoland 4y ago
  I think it's better than slacks sidebar threaded reply. It also has better code blocks, less irritating pop up magic and no bots nagging you to fill in credentials all the time.
- Operyl 4y ago
  That’s what the grandparent comment said, what specifically do you find wrong with the UI? I for one really enjoy it and the keyboard shortcuts.
yonixw 4y ago
I loved most of it, but (1) the search feature, specially for non English language, rely on postgres tokenized search which is worse than slack. (2) there is no "gallery view" for all files shared with a group or a person. (3) The mobile app had different render from the web.. and bad RTL render (4) slack bots compatibility sometimes miss the mark.. Other than that... It worked fine. I kinda liked it but slack is more robust for me (even if slow).
- tabbott 4y ago
  On the search front, have you tried the PGroonga search backend? https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/subsystems/full-text-search.html#multi-language-full-text-search https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/subsystems/full-text-... (It's only available when self-hosting at present.)

4 ms·

I've never used it. What's wrong with it?

by brink 4y ago

I've never used it. What's wrong with it?

cocolos 4y ago
UI is not great.
- capableweb 4y ago
  First time I used it, it was a bit confusing, as I didn't really know what to expect. Is it email? Live chat? A forum? Turns out, it's a bit of both, and trying to use it as any single one of them, will probably make it harder to use. Basically, I treat it as a live chat where it's easier to participate in different topics at the same time, Slack on steroids where everything is a "Thread" basically.
  - distances 4y ago
    Sounds similar to Flowdock model? I greatly preferred that and was so disappointed when Slack finally rolled out their version of threading. It felt almost useless in comparison. Alas, Flowdock is dead now and I've learned to embrace Slack as the better remaining alternative over Teams or Google Chat.
- drwoland 4y ago
  I think it's better than slacks sidebar threaded reply. It also has better code blocks, less irritating pop up magic and no bots nagging you to fill in credentials all the time.
- Operyl 4y ago
  That’s what the grandparent comment said, what specifically do you find wrong with the UI? I for one really enjoy it and the keyboard shortcuts.
yonixw 4y ago
I loved most of it, but (1) the search feature, specially for non English language, rely on postgres tokenized search which is worse than slack. (2) there is no "gallery view" for all files shared with a group or a person. (3) The mobile app had different render from the web.. and bad RTL render (4) slack bots compatibility sometimes miss the mark.. Other than that... It worked fine. I kinda liked it but slack is more robust for me (even if slow).
- tabbott 4y ago
  On the search front, have you tried the PGroonga search backend? https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/subsystems/full-text-search.html#multi-language-full-text-search https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/subsystems/full-text-... (It's only available when self-hosting at present.)