This comment seems a bit intellectually dishonest to me -- as an author the review was really useful to pinpoint improvements for future editions. The author o

This comment seems a bit intellectually dishonest to me -- as an author the review was really useful to pinpoint improvements for future editions. The author of the review also clearly states that the book was read and provides an unique opinion and perspective over what the book offers. It is also completely false that the review only comments on the length of the chapters. Have we read the same review? Or did you stop before "My Views" and the pros/cons? :)