3 ms·
> This is why we have courts, and why a contract is never examined in isolation. So are you suggesting that when considering the validity of a contract, exter
by maccard 4y ago
> This is why we have courts, and why a contract is never examined in isolation.
So are you suggesting that when considering the validity of a contract, externalities should be considered (e.g. the 20 email chain), but the actual document that was signed should not be considered?
- b112 4y agoI suggested no such thing. What I effectively did say, is that contracts exist in context. That context counts. See my other reply.