> So you believe then, that the majority of C++ code written at e.g. Microsoft is not 'modern'? Maybe some new code is modern - but there is a tremendous legac

> So you believe then, that the majority of C++ code written at e.g. Microsoft is not 'modern'? Maybe some new code is modern - but there is a tremendous legacy code base that can’t possibly be (and Microsoft has released enough open source that you can verify this yourself). Also retrofitting isn’t magic - the boundary between old and new will always cause problems.