3 ms·
This was my takeaway as well. So in order to not get screwed everytime I do business with any corporation (i.e. virtually constantly in the modern world), I hav
by shmageggy 4y ago
This was my takeaway as well. So in order to not get screwed everytime I do business with any corporation (i.e. virtually constantly in the modern world), I have to go scrutinize contracts, meticulously log phone calls, initiate and follow up on arbitration procedures, etc, and still lose money in the process? How is that a win? Who has time for all of that? It's so ridiculously one-sided, yet we're so conditioned to it that we think we're doing alright when we're just getting screwed.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> in order to not get screwed everytime I do business with any corporation This has nothing to do with corporations. If you decided to only do business with natural persons you’d have the same burden of proof.
- b3morales 4y agoSure, but there's still a crucial difference: the one other natural person has the same order of magnitude of resources to spend on the issue as you, instead of a multiple.
- Beltalowda 4y agoPlus a person might apply common sense and human judgement from the first contact instead of following procedure with no power to deviate from it even if it makes absolutely no sense at all.
- vorpalhex 4y agoYou should read contracts and, if things go wrong, keep contact logs.