>Gimp is quite on par with photoshop, and unless you are a pro, the difference of feature set doesn't matter. This is just a lie. My hatred of Adobe borders on

>Gimp is quite on par with photoshop, and unless you are a pro, the difference of feature set doesn't matter. This is just a lie. My hatred of Adobe borders on the unhinged but to compare GIMP to photoshop is a joke, it’s not even the pro features just the basic requirements that were completely expected 15+ years ago are missing and the attitude of the team to the userbase when they ask for these features is extremely poor. Honestly it’s time to start comparing GIMP to its real competitor, MSPaint. It’s not just UX, it’s the basic features they’d need to do a job with the tool are not there.